Skip to main content
English Home Latest About Us Editorial Team Bahasa Indonesia ID | EN

Sign in / Join

Explore

Home Latest Stories National International Business Education Opinion Bahasa Indonesia
Information
About JurnalPost Editorial Team Privacy Policy Media Kit
Sign in / Join
Follow us
ID ENGLISH
Home Latest National International Business Education Opinion

Latest

  1. UI Transforms Plastic Waste into Economic Value in Tembok Village, Bali

  2. Leadership Is More Than Grand Promises: The Public Awaits Tangible Results

  3. Public Assets Are Not Private Property: Understanding the Legal Framework for Managing State and Regional Assets

  4. UM Researchers Identify Key Pregnancy Risk Factors to Support Sustainable Development Goals

  5. HIMA-CARE Video Education Improves Menstrual Hygiene Practices Among New Female Students in Malang

  1. Home
  2. Articles
  3. Just Friends: When Friendship and Emotional Intimacy Blur the Lines

Just Friends: When Friendship and Emotional Intimacy Blur the Lines

E
Writer: Euzebia Valdiningsih Putri Ndia | Mahasiswa Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
October 15, 2026, 17:19 WITA Editor: Rina Maharani
9 min read
Two young people having a casual conversation on a university campus.
An illustration of two young people talking on a campus. Closeness in friendships can sometimes create emotional ambiguity when attention and expectations grow without a clear relationship status.

"We're just friends."

That simple phrase is likely familiar, especially when two people appear very close, check in with each other daily, know each other's habits, and are always present when one of them faces a problem.

IKLAN

To those around them, the relationship might look romantic. However, when asked about their status, the answer remains the same: just friends, or simply friends.

This phenomenon is interesting to observe because it is not always about the presence or absence of romantic feelings. More complex issues arise when a relationship labeled as friendship possesses an emotional intimacy resembling a romantic partnership, yet lacks clarity regarding the direction and boundaries of that connection.

In such situations, the term just friends is not merely an explanation of relationship status. Instead, it can be a reflection of the ongoing ambiguity.

Two people feel comfortable with the closeness they have built, but they do not necessarily share the same understanding of what their relationship means.

On one hand, this lack of clarity provides space to maintain closeness without the demands of commitment. On the other hand, such relationships can foster expectations, jealousy, and emotional uncertainty that are not always easy to express.

When the Boundaries of Friendship Begin to Blur

In daily life, Indonesians are familiar with terms like 'relationship without status' (HTS) or 'friends with benefits' (TTM). Both are often used to describe closeness between two people who are not officially in a romantic relationship but exhibit behavior more intense than typical friendships.

For example, two people might be accustomed to saying good morning and good night to each other, sharing personal stories, spending time together, and even using special nicknames that only they understand.

Such behavior does not always indicate a romantic relationship. Even close friendships can have deep emotional intimacy.

However, problems begin to arise when the intensity of the relationship develops without a mutual understanding of each person's boundaries and expectations.

In friendship, there are usually naturally formed boundaries. A person understands when to provide personal space, how much they can rely on their friend, and how to respect the social relationships that person has with others.

However, in relationships labeled as just friends, those boundaries sometimes shift gradually.

Communication becomes increasingly intense, emotional openness grows, and each other's presence begins to be considered an essential part of daily life.

Interestingly, this change often happens unconsciously.

There is no specific conversation about when the friendship turned into a closer relationship. There is also no agreement on what is actually happening.

As a result, a gap emerges between the closeness felt and the status used to explain the relationship.

That emotional intimacy does not mean it is insincere. Precisely because the attention and support provided feel real, one might start questioning the meaning of the relationship they are in.

Expectations That Grow Without Agreement

A relationship that lacks a clear status does not mean it is free from expectations.

When someone is used to receiving messages every day, they might feel a sense of loss when that habit suddenly stops.

The same applies when someone is always the first person to share stories with. Without realizing it, they may hope to hold an equally important position in that person's life.

Expectations like these grow from habits and emotional closeness, not from any agreement made together.

This is where ambiguity begins to cause problems.

One common manifestation is jealousy. Someone might feel uncomfortable when their close friend spends time with others, but they find it difficult to explain the reason behind those feelings.

They feel a special closeness, but at the same time, they realize there is no commitment that provides a basis to demand anything.

A sense of ownership begins to develop, while the boundaries of the relationship remain unclear.

This situation can leave someone trapped in a conflict between what they feel and what is considered appropriate to express.

In terms of status, both are just friends. However, emotionally, one or even both parties may have built further expectations.

When those expectations are never communicated, misunderstandings become increasingly likely.

One person may feel ignored, while the other party may not realize that their behavior has created certain expectations.

Why Is the 'Just Friends' Label Maintained?

If a relationship without clarity can cause discomfort, why do some people choose to maintain it?

In my opinion, there are several reasons that can explain this phenomenon.

First, the fear of losing the friendship.

Expressing feelings to a close friend is not an easy decision. There is a risk that those feelings will not receive the expected response.

For some, rejection does not just mean losing the chance to have a romantic relationship, but it also has the potential to change the friendship that has felt comfortable all this time.

That is why maintaining the status of friends is considered a safer choice.

Second, the desire to maintain freedom.

Relationships without status are often considered to provide flexibility because they are not accompanied by the obligations or commitments of dating.

IKLAN

One can enjoy emotional intimacy without having to define the relationship officially.

However, that freedom is not always understood in the same way by both parties.

For one person, the relationship might indeed be limited to a close friendship. Meanwhile, for the other, that closeness could be seen as a sign of the possibility of a more serious relationship.

Third, waiting for the right time.

Some people view just friends as a stage of getting to know each other that lasts longer. They want to understand one another before making a decision about a romantic relationship.

Under certain conditions, this choice can provide an opportunity to understand each other's character, habits, and compatibility.

However, when there is no communication regarding the direction of the relationship, a prolonged getting-to-know-you phase can also turn into a situation full of uncertainty.

For me, the label just friends is often a way to protect two things at once: the friendship that is feared to change when feelings are expressed, and the freedom that might diminish when a commitment is formed.

When a Sense of Security Turns Into a Waiting Room

One of the problems in an ambiguous relationship is that its emotional impact is not always felt equally.

Two people can be in the same relationship but interpret it differently.

One party might be truly comfortable with a close friendship without expecting a romantic relationship. Meanwhile, the other party might secretly harbor feelings and hope that the closeness will develop into something more serious.

For the first party, the relationship is proceeding as it should.

However, for the second party, every form of attention can be a reason to keep hoping.

A short message, an invitation to meet, or simple attention might be considered a sign that the relationship has a future.

In reality, the same action does not necessarily have the same meaning for the person doing it.

This difference in understanding can be a source of disappointment when it lasts too long.

A relationship that initially felt comfortable slowly turns into a waiting room without certainty.

Someone continues to maintain the closeness because they hope that one day their feelings will be reciprocated. Meanwhile, the other party may never realize that such hope exists.

When this state finally leads to emotional exhaustion, the relationship that was originally meant to be preserved risks becoming strained.

Ironically, the friendship status maintained to avoid loss can ultimately become a source of conflict.

Nevertheless, not all just friends relationships end in disappointment.

There are also two people who are truly comfortable having emotional intimacy without the desire to turn it into a romantic relationship.

The difference lies in the awareness and understanding of the relationship being lived.

When both parties understand each other's boundaries, needs, and expectations, emotional intimacy does not have to be a problem.

Conversely, when a relationship is lived based on different assumptions, ambiguity can develop into a source of discomfort.

Clarity Does Not Always Mean Having to Date

The just friends phenomenon shows that human relationships cannot always be explained through simple categories of friends and partners.

Emotional intimacy can be formed in various types of relationships. However, the more intense a relationship is, the more important communication becomes regarding the boundaries and expectations that accompany it.

In my opinion, clarity does not mean every close relationship must end with a decision to date.

Clarity is actually related to the courage to understand and convey feelings openly.

Two people can choose to remain friends even if they have a strong connection. They can also decide to develop the relationship into something more serious.

Whatever the choice, that decision should not be based solely on unilateral assumptions.

Open communication can help reduce misunderstandings while providing an opportunity for each party to determine the relationship boundaries that make them comfortable.

Ultimately, the main issue in the just friends phenomenon does not lie in the presence or absence of a romantic status.

The problem is when the closeness built together turns out to have different meanings for each party.

The label just friends can be a safe space to maintain a relationship, but it can also turn into a space full of hope that never finds certainty.

Therefore, the question that needs to be asked is not merely whether those two people are truly just friends or have deeper feelings.

The more important question is whether both are honest enough about the feelings, expectations, and boundaries of the relationship they are in.

Because, while ambiguity might be a choice as long as it is realized and understood together, when the lack of clarity is maintained without communication, one could end up bearing the emotional burden of a relationship that never even had an agreement.

Bahasa Indonesia Read in Bahasa Indonesia →
  • #communication
  • #just friends
  • #friendship
  • #emotional intimacy
  • #relationship without status
  • #relationship psychology
  • #social relationships

Share article

Share WhatsApp Tweet

Comments 0

Write a Comment Share your response

Comments appear after editorial approval.

  1. No comments yet. Be the first to respond.

Related Articles

Public Assets Are Not Private Property: Understanding the Legal Framework for Managing State and Regional Assets

Economic Development vs. Environmental Degradation: How Well Does Indonesian Law Protect Nature?

Is Using a Phone at a Red Light a Traffic Violation? A Legal Perspective

Pesantren Independence: From Religious Education Hubs to Rural Economic Drivers

JURNALPOST RECOMMENDS

Selected for You

UM Researchers Identify Key Pregnancy Risk Factors to Support Sustainable Development Goals

Beyond Trade: Pasar Turi Baru Surabaya Becomes a Vibrant Community Hub

Sidoarjo DP3AKB Holds FGD to Evaluate 2025–2029 Population Development Roadmap

UPN Veteran East Java Students Observe Tuban DPRD Budget Deliberations for 2027 Fiscal Year

Article source: https://jurnalpost.kolomopini.com/en/just-friends-when-friendship-and-emotional-intimacy-blur-the-lines/98190/

Printed from JurnalPost.com on November 3, 2026, 23:37 WITA

Most Popular

  1. 1 Revisiting Menstrual Leave: Between Presence and Absence
  2. 2

    Chaotic Campus Parking: A Discipline Issue or Poor Planning?

  3. 3

    UPN Veteran East Java Law Faculty Guides Kedungdowo Residents on Protecting Plant Varieties and Technological Innovations

  4. 4

    SDN 108 Ciumbuleuit Students Showcase Creativity at UNPAR PGSD Festival

  5. 5

    Travel Drivers Trained in Mandarin and AI Tools to Enhance Service for Chinese Tourists

IKLAN
JurnalPost

Independent reporting, public voices, and stories from Indonesia.

Explore

Advertorial Articles News Business Citizen Reporter Regional Economy English Version Essay Featured
Law International Opinion National Sports Education Politics Profiles Technology Travel

Information

About Us Citizen Journalism Cookie Policy Data Policy Submit an Opinion Submit an Article Media Kit Guidelines Editorial Team

Follow us

Facebook X/Twitter Instagram Threads TikTok Pinterest LinkedIn YouTube
© 2026 - PT Jurnal Post Indonesia. All Rights Reserved.